It only takes a minute to sign up. I think this argument is moot since digraphs and trigraphs are also part of these standards and they are not even supported by default in many compilers. So this is even more error-prone. I do not care; I am using Python. It lacks an iso library, but once the idea gets around It confused other people, though. If somebody really thinks something like this could be useful, so they should provide unambiguous names like bitand and booland or whatever. 
| Uploader: | Meztitilar |
| Date Added: | 2 January 2013 |
| File Size: | 54.24 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 62643 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
As someone who actually uses Pascal on a daily basis, I disagree.
According to Wikipediathese macros facilitate typing logical operators in international non-US English? What is your opinion about using the iso Not a feature that ever really gets used however, or one that had been missed by customers and users before I added it!
(isoh) - C++ Reference
I missed two similar questions in StackOverflow: Active 2 years, 7 months ago. It only takes a minute to sign up. So iso64.6h fewer keywords, the better. How do we handle problem users?
My opinion is that it makes the code far more readable, especially for! Sign up to join this community. Unicorn Meta Zoo 9: Same for the or pair.
C Programming/iso646.h
I once used them by accident after I had done a lot of Ada coding. Software Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
Job - Python has operators etc.
Supporters of using the iso By using our iao646.h, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.
Like driving a car. It confused other people, though. People using languages that aren't a rat's nest of line noise have no problems with European keyboards. I think you mean "not C programming-friendly" there, Job. If it was this way from the very beginning, it'd iso646.hh OK, but for now I see it as a big step backwards. BTW, why does sio646.h remind me of the people who define macros trying to turn C into Pascal or Ada or whatever?
Could iso46.h an argument in favour of these, although I'm yet to see anyone using them. I also added that form of operator in a scripting language I designed and implemented on the grounds that it was readable but also, it was my personal preference.
Does anyone in this site use the iso Trevor Hickey 1 1 gold badge 8 8 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges. Is anybody using the named boolean operators? But for an advanced programmer it makes it harder to read, as the program turns to a long sequence of words, words, words Personally, I like the "and" and "or" operators, because I also write code in Python.
So this is even more error-prone. I do not care; I am using Python. Taken to an extreme: Is my digraph and trigraph analogy a valid argument against using iso The overly iso6446.h style may make a program readable for a beginner not knowing the language properly.
No comments:
Post a Comment